Sunday, October 19, 2014

ICD-10 Testing : Operational Neutrality,Financial Neutrality and Benefit Neutrality

http://urtesting.blogspot.com/

ICD-10 Testing : As a part of overall ICD-10 testing , don't ignore Operational Neutrality, Financial Neutrality and Benefits Neutrality testing.

Operational Neutrality Testing : ICD-9 claims and its equivalent ICD-10 claims have to operate same way means if ICD-9 claims were denied then its equivalent ICD-10 claims also has to be denied,if ICD-9 claim were processed successfully then its ICD-10 claims have to be processed successfully.

Results of this testing will let you know if ICD-9 claims were processed successfully then why the ICD-10 is not processing successfully. This testing is must for ICD-10 test strategy.

Pull out thousand or ten thousand of  ICD-9 claims that was processed successfully or was denied/error out . Convert that claims to ICD-10 claims ( use some automation to convert ICD-9 claims to ICD-10 claims or manually covert it using the X-walk) and process that and see how these ICD-10 claims are working in your ICD-10 adjudication system  and see where is a problem , there may be payer specific edits that is not updated for ICD-10 claims or your clinical editing software is not working correctly or may be some other issues.

This testing will help you post production issues in advance and save your organization for ICD-10 disaster.

Financial Neutrality Testing : This testing will help you to know if  ICD-9 adjudication system were paying  $ X, are you also paying $ X for ICD-10 claims for the same ICD-9 claims or there are minus or plus in pricing. This testing is must for Financial neutrality of ICD-9 claims and ICD-10 claims.
ICD-9 and ICD-10 coding systems are Financial Neutral means there should not be any payment variation, if you find investigate the cause of variation.

Claims are paid either at claim level like DRG or Case rate or line level like  outpatient visits like  professional claims. Make sure that each line is priced equivalent to ICD-9 claims. Get the allowable amount of each line and compare with ICD-9 and ICD-10 claims. Make sure to compare the allowable amounts and not the benefits amounts( like copay, deductible and co-insurance as this varies for every visits).

Ensure providers contracts that uses ICD-9  diagnosis and procedure codes for pricing get re-mediated for  ICD-10 codes otherwise these claims will never be priced. Not all contracts uses Diagnosis codes/Procedure codes but some providers use Diagnosis codes/Procedure codes as a part of provider contracts and that need to be re-mediated specially check all your networx contracts.

Create some automation script to pull out ICD-9 and ICD-10 claims and compare each service line and see the difference in dollar amount  in spread sheet. If there is any variation investigate the issues. May be provider contract has been changed, Fee schedule   has been changed , your contract terms has been changed from per Diem to Case rate or  DRG pricing has changed orany other issues.

Benefits Neutrality : ICD-10 system has nothing to do with benefits of  health plans so cost sharing between Patient and Health plans has to be 100 % neutral. Copay, deductible , co-insurance , out of pocket maximum has to be neutral.

This is going to be neutral unless your health plans have any components bases on ICD-9 Diagnosis codes and Procedure codes.Generally this is least important out of there neutrality testing. 

Please leave comments if you have any.

urteting.blogspot.com 

Saturday, October 18, 2014

ICD-10 Testing of ICD-9 E codes ( E codes can not be a Primary Diagnosis Code)

http://urtesting.blogspot.com/

ICD-9 E codes are external cause of  injury codes and in ICD-9 claims processing system these codes can not be  used as Primary Codes. If submitted as E codes then this has to be denied. Therefor corresponding X-walk of all this ICD-9 E codes to ICD-10 codes has to be testing as a part of ICD-10 testing.

There are so many ICD-9 E codes and here are  first 20 of the X-walk based on Gems tool.

ICD-9 Codes ICD-10 Codes
E0000      Y990      
E0001      Y991      
E0002      Y992      
E0008      Y998      
E0009      Y999      
E0010      Y9301     
E0011      Y9302     
E0020      Y9311     
E0021      Y9312     
E0022      Y9313     
E0023      Y9314     
E0024      Y9315     
E0025      Y9316     
E0026      Y9317     
E0027      Y9318     
E0028      Y9319     
E0029      Y9319     
E0030      Y9321     
E0031      Y9322     
E0032      Y9323     

Test your ICD-10 system to ensure that all ICD-10 external cause of entry claims denied when used as Primary Diagnosis codes.

There are also significant number of E-codes that are no longer valid in ICD-10 world( orphan codes), see my previous post for such codes and its impact.

Sunday, June 15, 2014

Are ICD-9 and ICD-10 going to be Financial Neutral? Must test your DRG grouper.

ICD-10 has yet to be implemented in USA and yet  to see the real financial impact of ICD-9 to ICD-10.But in theory both ICD-9 and ICD-10 should not  to have  any financial impact and variation.The way ICD-9 and ICD-10 has been designed has nothing to take with the claim pricing in claims as claims pricing depends on HCPCS codes or revenue codes ( used in Provider agreements/networks for pricing   ) that are not going to change by ICD-10 implementation.But one thing that is most important to understand the inpatient claims pricing that uses DRG codes. ICD-9 and ICD-10 has the same DRG but the DRG grouper that uses Diagnosis code has a impact and hence the DRG might changes in claims based on the DRG grouper / or the X-walk that built the DRG codes and then there would be absolutely price variation in ICD-10 claims.Make sure to test enough inpatients claims to make sure that ICD-9 and ICD-10 claims are financial neutral.

Thursday, April 10, 2014

ICD-10 Delay : CMS has not yet not declared the new implementation date, should we ready for any surprise ?

http://urtesting.blogspot.com/

Its been a week ICD-10 has been delayed but CMS has yet not come up with the new implementation.Are CMS thinking something different than us and may come up with something that will surprise everyone may be implementation of ICD-11, I am just think .. dont get me wrong. If CMS come with ICD-11 dont know what will happen to future.My finger is crossed and waiting to hear from CMS.

urtesting.blogspot.com

Wednesday, April 2, 2014

ICD-10 delay,is this the beginning of ICD-11

http://urtesting.blogspot.com/
I have a apprehension that as ICD-10 has delayed to the earliest as of now is 1 oct 2015, WHO will be ready for ICD-11 code set by 2017 so should we not wait for another 2 year and implement ICD-11 code set directly rather than going through ICD-10 and then   down the line new code set is coming.If industry has waited for than 20 years to implement ICD 10 then what's the harm in waiting 2 years and implement directly ICD-11.I am not saying this but our politician will say that and again pass the bill that will stop the ICD implementation for ever and that will be sub set for ICD-10 code set.

Monday, March 31, 2014

ICD-10 delay - bad bad for all

http://urtesting.blogspot.com/
ICD-10 is delayed by at least an year is bad bad for healthcare space ,it is good for nothing and again a good reason to procrastinate beneath the delay.If you are not prepared on last 3 years how you are hoping that you will be ready in another year ? These guys will just chilled down and again say we are not ready.it was time to take the tough decision that was good for industry. Think about the college graduate who started preparing for ICD-10 from last 2 year  hoping they will get the job this year , they are under water now.Think about the payers who has invested so much in training their staffs for ICD-10 ,  year delay will just kill all the training skill they have , they again need to be trained.think about the providers who hired the ICD-10 staffs for billing and EHR softwares ,they are not going to use for another 1 more year ,this is crazy and insane and overhead for industry.
I am not able to understand by extending an year who is going to benefited, is this patient  no way.But it time to bite the bullet and move on with the same spirit for the good and quality healthcare. Sooner or later it's need to be fixed but sooner the better.

Sunday, February 16, 2014

CMS form 1500 has been released for ICD-10 testing

http://urtesting.blogspot.com/

CMS has released form 1500 for the professional claim  for  providers using a paper claims. This new form has a ICD indicator for ICD-9 and ICD-10 claims.

The timeline is:
  • January 6, 2014: Payers begin receiving and processing paper claims submitted on the revised 1500 Claim Form (version 02/12).
  • January 6 through March 31, 2014: Dual use period during which payers continue to receive and process paper claims submitted on the old 1500 Claim Form (version 08/05).
  • April 1, 2014: Payers receive and process paper claims submitted only on the revised 1500 Claim Form (version 02/12).
Please use the below URL to download the form and sample example.

http://www.nucc.org/%5Cimages%5Cstories%5CPDF%5C1500_claim_form_2012_02.pdf

visit - NUCC site  for more deatils.http://nucc.org/

http://urtesting.blogspot.com/